from July 22
The following morning was a frantic re-costuming into business clothes costumes for that afternoon’s National Biodiesel Board board meeting. You see, the meeting had a dress code, and today was Business Casual (the next day was more formal ‘business attire’ as that was the day we were supposed to meet with our Elected Officials, lobby them about biodiesel, and impress them with our ability to wear business clothing). I’d been wondering for days just what Business Casual means for women’s clothing, and watching commuters on public transit to try and decipher the code. Of course I flew out here with three bags of tools and books, and brought almost no extra clothes due to the ‘weight of luggage/getting around on public transit’ issue (but I brought along some high heel shoes that I’d dumpster-dived), figuring I’d stop at a thrift store or some Sweatshop Clothing Outlet or something and buy the appropriate costumes that day. Fortunately we were now staying with another Takoma Park woman who dresses like a model, and she had a closetful of Business Costume to loan out. She lent all four of us (including the men) the appropriate clothing, and off we went in appropriate Business Casual (theirs all involved mustard yellow Piedmont Biofuels shirts, so they made quite a uniformed crowd once we hit the board meeting). Socially retarded that we are, we were making fun of each other for not being dressed in our usual grease or workclothes. Oh and talking about tanks if I remember right.
The first thing to greet me coming out of the Metro in DC was a giant sign that blared “THIS BUS POWERED BY CLEAN NATURAL GAS”. Oh brother. Biodiesel’s not even on the map as far as marketing goes. Then I passed a billboard for “Clean Energy From Coal” and remembered that I was in DC where it seems that half the (middleclass that is) residents seem to have some sort of government consultant job and that their opinions help shape the government that covers all the rest of the country. And that there were about a bazillion special interests vying for their attention and for that of the Elected Officials (and their aides and their aides’ consultants). Biodiesel was supposed to do it’s best this week against the clamor of other Special Interests.
The NBB meeting started with some routine work and then proceeded to the small producer issue which we were partially there to witness. They voted on the new NBB compromise policy (cutting the dues for small producers in half), after announcing that they’d struck the small producer workgroup’s recommended “quality testing requirements for all members” before it went to the vote . Wow, that was quick, we’d been demanding something along the lines of that compromise, in the NBB convention hallway just six months ago, and I was insisting that the NBB could make the issue go away “ at the stroke of a pen”. I’d known that this compromise was likely to be the change in policy for a few months now (Joe Jobe had been promoting “$2500 a year, with a deal on BQ 9000 certification” for about six months). Right after that, a guy from ADM had the appropriately clueless industry kneejerk reaction and stood up to proclaim that it was tragic (well he didn’t really say tragic) that allowing small producers access to the market was going to doom them to selling B100 where quality matters much more than in blends, and that there’s no way that these small producers can afford the safety equipment and quality control to make quality fuel “the way we [bigger producers that is] can”. He also mentioned something about 1970’s European biodiesel plants having explosions (I think) in this context of our lack of safety equipment. As Mr. Kneejerk sat down, I spied in front of him the NBB member whose company had made and sold to us some offspec fuel about a year ago.
Me and Jennifer and the Mustard Yellow Shirt Crowd and Bill Levitt all filed out to the hallway to have a huddle on how we felt about the compromise issue. Joe Jobe followed us out to ask the same. I of course immediately played my self-appointed role (as “bad cop”) and asked him why the “quality testing for all NBB members” rule got struck. He said that the NBB’s concern is that they don’t want to become a policing organization or something along those lines. Waahhh! This could have really been a revolutionary change in the biodiesel industry had this rule become policy. It’s really kind of amazing that forcing the small producer issue resulted in a much greater issue coming to light- that of quality control and large scale producers. I had the feeling that we were somewhat playing roles- The Piedmonts took the opportunity to tell Joe that instead of giving the NBB $2500 last winter they’d instead spent it on a tanker truck to sell B100 from, and several of us waved my copy of the NBB membership agreement in his face and asked him questions about how the new ruling affects some of the other NBB regulations (the NBB really doestn’ like giving these out). I occasionally got the feeling that some of us like pointing out to the NBB that sometimes, well, we are in a position to do ‘an end run around the NBB’ on some issues that the NBB would rather be leading all us sheep along on.
The rest of the day was interesting because much of it was dominated by committee presentations, which some of us techie heads liked. Steve Howell, the Technical Committee Chair (I think) presented a lot of great info about where NBB research is going. At lunch we followed him out like a flock of mustard yellow polo shirts, and surrounded him with questions.
I was bugging Steve about the justifications that are used in the auto/Fuel Injection Equipment/petroleum industries for opposing biodiesel based on “distillation curve” specifications grounds, and on viscosity grounds. At one point I mentioned the point that Dr. Van Gerpen’s always makes about the fact that biodiesel’s greater viscosity doesn’t actually impair operation or equipment lifespan, since the same FIE equipment is designed to operate on petrodiesel in winter temperatures which can have the same viscosity as biodiesel has at it’s lowest usable temps, since biodiesel stops being usable (ie clouding/cold weather filter clogging and gelling) long before it gets more viscous and gets outside the normal diesel viscosity range. Steve sounded glad to hear this argument again but pointed out that Delphi asserts that they have had injector pump seizures where shafts snapped on biodiesel in cold weather. He happened to mention them as “Delphi, formerly Lucas”, which rang a bell for me about viscosity and those injection pumps.
I told him that it’s well known among SVO enthusiasts worldwide that Lucas/CAV pumps are inordinately sensitive to viscosity and that they are prone to failures on SVO but that other pumps don’t have the same experience. He was surprised to hear this, and I realized that some of the technical experience we have with pushing the envelope with SVO and biodiesel can actually be useful in the work that he and others do via the ASTM standards development and other work that involves answering to fuel injection equipment manufacturers concerns. Essentially I think that this sort of exchange on technical issues is something that the NBB needs to hear.
I’d already been planning to join ASTM and to get on the biodiesel committees, but this Board meeting really brought home the importance of having more of us do this. Jennifer talked with him about the same subject, and about trying to work together on making more quantitative and useful the ‘data’ that Biofuel Oasis has to collect on it’s customers for the California Department of Measurement Standards (a huge issue in California is that they just made B100 sales illegal other than through variances and ‘coops’ and that Oasis and others have to apply for this variance until such a time as B100 standalone standard becomes available… and at the meeting that day, Steve admitted that the project of the B100 standalone standard wasn’t even on the table at ASTM anytime soon…)